In five of the six latest rate-cutting cycles, investment-grade (IG) corporate bonds have outperformed the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (Agg) and the Bloomberg US Treasury Index the 12 months following the first rate cut by an average of 3.25% and 4.33%, respectively. And with only 11 investment-grade corporate bond defaults in 25 years, these higher returns have historically come with low levels is risk and has the potential to rival that of government securities.
12-Month Performance Following the Fed's First Interest-Rate Cut
Over the Long Run, Corporate Debt has Outperformed Treasuries and MBS
Historically, the additional yield offered by corporate debt has paid off for patient investors. Corporate debt has outperformed two of its more conservative fixed-income counterparts—U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities (MBS)—over the past 40 rolling 10-year periods. Investment-grade corporate bonds outpaced those two asset classes 94% of the time, and high yield outperformed them 91% of the time. Not only that, over the past 10 rolling 10-year periods, investment-grade corporate bonds and high-yield bonds have generated a positive risk-adjusted return of 0.21% and 0.45%, respectively, vs. -0.04% for Treasuries and -0.03% for mortgage-backed securities.
Corporate Debt vs. Treasuries and MBS Over Past 40 Years1
The Risks of CDs
Certificate of deposits (CDs) don’t carry many of the traditional risks of fixed income, but they do have some, including:
Less Purchasing Power: CDs do not adjust to increases in interest rates and inflation like some areas of fixed income, which leads to less real purchasing power for investors. No Capital Appreciation: While some areas of fixed income will see price increases when interest rates fall, CD investors do not benefit from capital appreciation. Lack of Liquidity: While some CDs offer an out for investors, to do so does incur a stiff penalty for investors to access their cash. Lower Returns: Historically, when CD rates have been high, corporate bond yields have been even higher.
High CD Rates Historically Have Meant Higher Corporate-Bond Yields
Performance of CDs After Rates Peak
While certificate of deposit (CD) rates have dramatically risen since early 2022, history has shown they decline just as rapidly. In the six times since 1984 when CD rates peaked, returns have declined in the following year by an average of 28%. During these periods, many corporate fixed-income sectors have outperformed CDs by a wide margin.
Returns in a Declining-Rate Environment
Active vs. Passive Fixed-Income Management
While taxable fixed-income flows have dramatically favored passive-based strategies over the past 12 months ($228 billion have flowed into passive fixed income vs. $33 billion for active fixed income), given the 147 basis points of outperformance by active fixed income over the period, investors have left quite a bit of money on the table in the amount of $3.36 billion. Then when you go back over the past three years, investors have also lost almost four times more in passive fixed-income strategies. In dollars, passive fixed-income investors have lost almost $10.71 billion more due to their choice of selecting a passive fixed-income option over an active fixed-income solution. While investors might be choosing passive fixed-income strategies due to their less expensive price tag, this might be costing investors quite a bit more in the long run if this return pattern continues.
Investors Have Benefited From Active Fixed-Income Management Over the Past 1, 3 and 5 Years
Is the Time Right for Corporate Debt?
Historically, when investment-grade corporate bonds, high-yield bonds and bank loans have reached the same price and yield levels as today’s, they’ve generated a 12-month return well above each asset class’s 20-year annualized return (6.49% for high-yield bonds; 3.96% for investment-grade corporate bonds; and 4.74% for bank loans).
Historical 12-Month Returns At Varying Price and Yield Levels
Keeping Up with the Changing Fixed-Income Market
Back in 1993, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index was made up of 6,074 issues, had a market value of $3.9 trillion and, dating back to 1976, had never experienced negative returns in two consecutive calendar years.
Today, the investment-grade bond market is made up of 13,417 issues, has a market value of $26.51 trillion and just recently experienced its first negative returns in consecutive years. With how much the fixed-income market has changed over three decades, is it time for a different investment approach and to consider corporate bonds?
Average Calendar-Year Returns When the Agg Has Been Negative
What Happened During the Last Soft Landing?
The last time the economy had a soft landing after a Federal Reserve ratehiking cycle occurred in 1995. In the nearly four years after the end of that rate hiking cycle when the Fed held rates relatively stable, investment-grade corporate bonds outperformed many fixed-income asset classes. The Fed’s current hiking cycle, which to date has closely paralleled the one in the mid-1990s, may have the economy coming in for a similar soft landing. If the economy continues on this path, corporate credit may be an attractive option for investors who are looking to find more yield.
Returns From the Last Soft Landing After Fed Rate-Hiking Cycle (Feb. 1995 to Nov. 1998)
Putting Default Worries in Perspective
Investor concern about defaults and distressed exchanges for high-yield bonds and leveraged loans may be overblown. Through the first nine months of 2024, there have been only 65 defaults/distressed exchanges for those asset classes for a default rate of 1.64% for high-yield bonds (historical average: 3.40%) and 3.70% for leveraged loans (historical average: 3.40%). Digging a bit deeper, much of the default and distressed-exchange activity this year (38%) and historically since 2008 (about 18%) came from repeat offenders, meaning many active managers would likely be leery of further investing in those names.
High-Yield and Leveraged-Loan Defaults and Distressed Exchanges (2020-Sept. 2024)
Can BBB Yields Make Up for Agg Losses?
Despite a rally last year in fixed income, many investors may find themselves in a hole when it comes to their core fixed-income position with the total return for the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index over the past three years at -9.62%. When you back out yield and just look at price return, those returns fall to -16.70%. Though the index yield still sits near a multi-decade high of 4.53%, it could take over two years for investors to see positive returns on core fixed-income positions added three years go. On the other hand, BBB investment-grade corporate bonds could help shorten that breakeven period, as BBB corporates started the year with a yield of 5.28%.
Can BBB Corporate Bonds Help Make Up for the Agg's Poor Performance in 2021 and 2022?
Share this post:
Any performance data quoted represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results.
Index performance is not indicative of any fund’s performance. Indexes are unmanaged and it is not possible to invest directly in an index. For current standardized performance of the funds, please visit www.AristotleFunds.com.
The views expressed are as of the publication date and are presented for informational purposes only. These views should not be considered as investment advice, an endorsement of any security, mutual fund, sector or index, or to predict performance of any investment or market. Any forward-looking statements are not guaranteed. All material is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice as market and other conditions warrant.
Investors should consider a fund’s investment goal, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds. The prospectuses and/or summary prospectuses should be read carefully before investing.
Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.
Foreside Financial Services, LLC, distributor.
Bloomberg Finance L.P. is unaffiliated with Aristotle Capital, Aristotle Funds, their affiliates, their distributors, and representatives.
Unfortunately, Internet Explorer is an outdated browser and we do not support it. To have the best browsing experience, please upgrade to Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.